http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/news-july-25-2009/ Road trip news, rants, and ruminations by the Editors of RoadsideAmerica.com Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:21:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/news-july-25-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2082 Tara Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:44:38 +0000 http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-2082 You have to wonder how they got the sharks into the moat at that castle? It's not like you just call your local pet shop - funny! You have to wonder how they got the sharks into the moat at that castle? It’s not like you just call your local pet shop – funny!

]]> http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/news-july-25-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2079 Craig Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:01:23 +0000 http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-2079 According to this federal court decision, http://openjurist.org/444/us/335, the border is the low water mark in 1792, when Kentucky became a state. Unless the rock was in the shore on the north side of the river at some point that year, then it seems it was clearly in Kentucky. According to this federal court decision, http://openjurist.org/444/us/335, the border is the low water mark in 1792, when Kentucky became a state. Unless the rock was in the shore on the north side of the river at some point that year, then it seems it was clearly in Kentucky.

]]> http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/news-july-25-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2078 Craig Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:45:59 +0000 http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/?p=2375#comment-2078 It will be interesting to see how the Indian Rock trial goes. The state line of Kentucky along the Ohio River is defined as the low water mark on the north bank, not the middle of the river, a fact missing from that article. Unless they can show that the rock was completely exposed at some point on the Ohio side, I don't see how they can argue that it wasn't in Kentucky when they took it. It will be interesting to see how the Indian Rock trial goes. The state line of Kentucky along the Ohio River is defined as the low water mark on the north bank, not the middle of the river, a fact missing from that article. Unless they can show that the rock was completely exposed at some point on the Ohio side, I don’t see how they can argue that it wasn’t in Kentucky when they took it.

]]>